2026 SEASON · WEEK 3

ACTIVE PLAYER PROFILE

Khalil Mack

LB · LAC · Active

Age 35College BuffaloDepth SLB #1

Cumulative season CFI51.7#40 of 103 · same-position season grade

Weekly CFI · Week 270.3#12 of 83 · same-position weekly grade

Predictive CFI · vs BUF49.4Week 3 · experimental projection · low confidence

How this is estimated

Experimental EDGE projection: qualified current-season grades from the previous four weeks, weighted by snaps and recency and regressed toward 50. Opponent unit pass and run performance adjusts the estimate by at most four points. Limited game history; low confidence.

Next matchup

Current schedule and opponent context

Week 3

Away · 2026-09-27 · 1:00 PMLAC vs BUFHighmark Stadium · 66°F · 8 mph wind · Partly Sunny

Matchup rank#32#1 is the easiest opposing offense by EPA/play

CFI history and comparable paths

Qualified weekly form plus the closest same-position index profiles

Same-position context

Khalil MackMalcolm Koonce · comparableCameron Thomas · comparableCashius Howell · comparable

Malcolm KoonceLV · 51.5 CFI Cameron ThomasATL · 52 CFI Cashius HowellCIN · 51.3 CFI

Weekly CFI history

Same-position percentile grade for each qualifying week in 2026. The season CFI above is the cumulative grade.

Week	Weekly CFI	Rank	Qualified players	Volume
1	36.4	#69	90	51
2	70.3	#12	83	42

Advanced Player Research

Production, usage, efficiency, and indexes for 2026

Performance · 2026

Advanced efficiency

defense

Pressure rate: 9.43%
Pass rush win rate: 7.84%
Run stop rate: 5.26%
Sacks / pass rush: 1.89%
Hits / pass rush: 3.77%
Hurries / pass rush: 3.77%
Missed tackle rate: 20%
Defensive grade: 71.27
Pass rush grade: 65.75
Run defense grade: 67.25
Pressures: 5
Charted sacks: 1
Charted QB hits: 2
QB hurries: 2
Batted passes: 0
Run stops: 2
Charted solo tackles: 3
Charted assists: 1
Missed tackles: 1
Defensive snaps: 93
Pass rush snaps: 53
Run defense snaps: 40

Core indexes · experimental v1.4

CoreFootball Index (CFI) #40 of 10351.7

Same-position rank: #40 of 103. Eligible position cohort: players.

Input	Value	Percentile	Weight

Weekly game log

Week	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
1	1	2	0	0	6.5%	0	0	0	1	0
2	2	3	1	2	13.6%	0	0	0	1	0

Home and away

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
HomeSmall sample	2	3	5	1	2	9.4%	0	0	0	2	0

Indoor and outdoor

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
IndoorSmall sample	2	3	5	1	2	9.4%	0	0	0	2	0

Temperature

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended

Game setting data is unavailable for this selection.

Wind

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended

Game setting data is unavailable for this selection.

Opponent history

Performance against opponents across imported seasons

Opponent	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended	Last meeting
NYJ	4	12	21	4	3	—	0	1	0	6	1	2023-11-06
HOU	5	13	17	3	6	—	0	2	1	5	2	2025-12-27
NE	5	13	19	4	8	—	0	1	0	5	1	2024-12-28
MIA	5	10	16	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	0	2023-09-10
LAC	9	20	35	2	6	—	0	0	0	7	3	2019-10-27
ARI	5	17	23	2	3	6.5%	0	1	0	5	2	2026-09-13
CLE	5	12	19	5	8	—	0	2	0	8	0	2024-11-03
SEA	3	8	13	1	2	—	0	1	1	1	0	2022-10-23
DEN	15	41	53	13	19	—	0	4	1	17	8	2024-12-19
KC	17	45	72	10	25	—	0	1	0	11	6	2025-12-14
LA	6	7	10	2	3	—	0	2	0	1	0	2023-01-01
SF	3	6	11	3	6	—	0	0	0	5	0	2022-11-13
BUF	4	8	18	2	5	—	0	1	1	3	1	2023-12-23
CINSmall sample	2	4	6	1	1	—	0	0	0	1	0	2021-09-19
BAL	5	16	25	3	5	—	0	0	0	3	1	2024-11-25
CHISmall sample	2	5	5	1	1	—	0	0	0	2	1	2023-10-29
PIT	3	2	8	2	3	—	0	1	0	2	0	2025-11-09
MIN	9	11	18	5	9	—	1	3	1	3	2	2025-10-23
DET	9	21	28	3	8	—	0	0	1	6	0	2023-11-12
TEN	8	15	27	2	3	—	0	0	0	4	3	2025-11-02
GB	9	28	36	8.5	8	—	1	3	1	9	2	2023-11-19
NO	4	14	22	2	3	—	0	1	0	2	0	2024-10-27
ATL	4	6	14	0.5	6	—	0	1	1	0	1	2024-12-01
JAX	4	11	13	1	3	—	0	0	0	3	0	2025-11-16
TB	5	11	15	5	8	—	0	2	0	5	2	2024-12-15
CAR	3	5	12	2	3	—	1	1	1	1	1	2024-09-15
IND	4	7	9	2	4	—	0	0	0	2	0	2025-10-19
WASSmall sample	2	7	13	3	5	—	0	2	0	1	0	2019-09-23
NYG	4	10	15	4	6	—	0	2	2	2	1	2020-09-20
DAL	4	7	14	4	7	—	0	0	0	4	0	2025-12-21
PHI	3	10	13	0	4	—	0	0	0	3	1	2025-12-08
LV	11	29	45	14	17	13.6%	0	4	2	12	4	2026-09-20

Game log

Location, game environment, workload, and production

Season	Week	Opponent	Site	Environment	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
2026	1	ARI	Home	Indoor	1	2	0	0	6.5%	0	0	0	1	0
2026	2	LV	Home	Indoor	2	3	1	2	13.6%	0	0	0	1	0

Career totals

Regular-season totals across available career history

Season	Team	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
2014	LV	16	55	76	4	12	—	0	1	0	14	3
2015	LV / OAK	16	55	77	15	24	—	0	2	0	23	2
2016	LV	16	48	73	11	26	—	1	5	3	14	3
2017	LV	16	51	78	10.5	22	—	0	1	1	14	3
2018	CHI	14	33	45	12.5	18	—	1	6	2	10	4
2019	CHI	16	38	47	8.5	14	—	0	5	1	8	4
2020	CHI	16	26	50	9	13	—	1	3	2	9	3
2021	CHI	7	15	19	6	7	—	0	0	1	6	0
2022	LAC	17	25	50	8	12	—	0	2	2	10	2
2023	LAC	17	45	74	17	22	—	0	5	0	17	10
2024	LAC	16	18	39	6	15	—	0	2	1	6	9
2025	LAC	12	19	32	5.5	11	—	0	4	0	6	0
2026	LAC	2	3	5	1	2	9.4%	0	0	0	2	0
Career	All teams	181	431	665	114	198	9.4%	3	36	13	139	43

Weekly CFI is a same-position percentile grade using the published weekly play and production fields. CFI uses the same position model as the leaderboard. A dash means the source data or a qualified model is unavailable. Historical production is from nflverse; charted blocking and pressure metrics cover published charting reports only. Missing values are left blank rather than estimated.