2026 SEASON · WEEK 10

ACTIVE PLAYER PROFILE

Malik Willis

QB · MIA · IR

Age 27College Liberty; AuburnDepth QB #1

Cumulative season CFI27.7#36 of 44 · same-position season grade

Weekly CFI · Week 925.9#26 of 31 · same-position weekly grade

Predictive CFI—Available when the next game is published

Core Fantasy Index (CFX)54#28 of 61 · same-position rank

CFI history and comparable paths

Qualified weekly form plus the closest same-position index profiles

Same-position context

Malik WillisSam Darnold · comparableTanner McKee · comparableMichael Penix Jr. · comparable

Sam DarnoldSEA · 29.5 CFI Tanner McKeePHI · 23 CFI Michael Penix Jr.ATL · 39.8 CFI

Weekly CFI history

Same-position percentile grade for each qualifying week in 2026. The season CFI above is the cumulative grade.

Week	Weekly CFI	Rank	Qualified players	Volume
1	30.3	#27	32	38
2	50	#21	35	29
3	35.5	#27	32	45
4	18.8	#31	33	21
5	38.4	#22	31	38
7	82	#5	28	31
8	60.9	#12	28	38
9	25.9	#26	31	30

Advanced Player Research

Production, usage, efficiency, and indexes for 2026

Fantasy Performance · 2026

PPR points105.04

Expected points113.98

Actual points109.04

Points over expected-4.94

Advanced efficiency

passing

plays: 270
epa per play: -0.11
cpoe: -4.82
success rate: 41.41%
success plays: 106
success plays total: 256
success dropbacks: 256

Weekly fantasy opportunity

● Actual● Expectedffopportunity · PPR

Core indexes · experimental v1.4

CoreFootball Index (CFI) #36 of 4427.7

The 2026 QB season CFI compares season-long inputs with qualified 2026 QBs using the weekly QB model weights. 2 qualified games are required.

CoreFantasy Index (CFX) #28 of 6154

Same-position rank: #28 of 61. Eligible position cohort: players.

Input	Value	Percentile	Weight

CoreOpportunity Score (OS) #29 of 6152.9

Same-position rank: #29 of 61. Eligible position cohort: players.

Input	Value	Percentile	Weight

CoreEfficiency Score (ES) #28 of 6155

Same-position rank: #28 of 61. Eligible position cohort: players.

Input	Value	Percentile	Weight

Weekly game log

Week	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %	QB rating
1	16.7	16.7	220	39	0	1	1	55.6%	66.9
2	12.5	12.5	197	6	1	0	0	60.9%	103
3	10	10	210	56	0	0	1	55.6%	61.1
4	2.5	2.5	85	11	0	0	0	52.9%	67
5	18.9	18.9	137	74	1	1	2	55.6%	51
7	26	26	208	37	2	1	0	66.7%	130.7
8	14.6	14.6	211	2	2	0	1	65.6%	92.1
9	3.8	3.8	128	7	0	0	1	52%	50.1

Next Gen Stats · passing

avg time to throw: 3.06
avg completed air yards: 6.01
avg intended air yards: 9.34
avg air yards differential: -3.34
aggressiveness: 18.27
max completed air distance: 52.38
avg air yards to sticks: -0.2
attempts: 208
pass yards: 1,396
pass touchdowns: 6
interceptions: 6
QB rating: 76.12
completions: 121
Completion %: 58.17
expected completion percentage: 60.27
completion percentage above expectation: -2.1
avg air distance: 22.21
max air distance: 59.39

Home and away

Production by game setting

Split	Games	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %
Home	4	47.3	11.8	686	139	3	1	5	57.5%
Away	4	57.7	14.4	710	93	3	2	1	59.1%

Indoor and outdoor

Production by game setting

Split	Games	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %
IndoorSmall sample	2	19.2	9.6	305	50	0	1	1	54.5%
Outdoor	6	85.8	14.3	1,091	182	6	2	5	59.1%

Temperature

Production by game setting

Split	Games	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %
40–69°FSmall sample	1	12.5	12.5	197	6	1	0	0	60.9%
70°F and aboveSmall sample	1	10	10	210	56	0	0	1	55.6%

Wind

Production by game setting

Split	Games	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %
Below 10 mphSmall sample	2	22.5	11.2	407	62	1	0	1	57.6%

Opponent history

Performance against opponents across imported seasons

Opponent	Games	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %	Last meeting
BUFSmall sample	1	-0.2	-0.2	6	16	0	0	0	25%	2022-09-19
INDSmall sample	2	13	6.5	122	41	1	0	0	85.7%	2024-09-15
HOUSmall sample	2	11.7	5.8	154	55	0	1	3	60.6%	2022-12-24
KCSmall sample	2	17.2	8.6	290	96	0	0	1	48.1%	2026-09-27
DENSmall sample	1	-2.4	-2.4	0	-4	0	0	0	—	2022-11-13
PHISmall sample	2	1.4	0.7	16	8	0	0	0	40%	2024-09-06
LACSmall sample	1	1.6	1.6	20	8	0	0	0	75%	2022-12-18
CLESmall sample	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2023-09-24
BALSmall sample	2	36.2	18.1	362	77	1	2	0	84.6%	2025-12-27
ATLSmall sample	1	-1.6	-1.6	0	4	0	0	0	—	2023-10-29
TENSmall sample	1	25.4	25.4	202	73	1	1	0	68.4%	2024-09-22
JAXSmall sample	1	8.5	8.5	56	23	1	0	0	80%	2024-10-27
SFSmall sample	2	12.5	6.2	197	6	1	0	0	60.9%	2026-09-20
NOSmall sample	1	1.2	1.2	34	-2	0	0	0	50%	2024-12-23
CHISmall sample	2	17	8.5	257	47	1	0	0	79.2%	2025-12-20
NYGSmall sample	1	5.8	5.8	6	16	1	0	0	100%	2025-11-16
MINSmall sample	2	3.1	1.5	92	14	0	0	0	55.6%	2026-10-04
LVSmall sample	1	16.7	16.7	220	39	0	1	1	55.6%	2026-09-13
CINSmall sample	1	18.9	18.9	137	74	1	1	2	55.6%	2026-10-11
NYJSmall sample	1	26	26	208	37	2	1	0	66.7%	2026-10-25
NESmall sample	1	14.6	14.6	211	2	2	0	1	65.6%	2026-11-01
DETSmall sample	1	3.8	3.8	128	7	0	0	1	52%	2026-11-08

Game log

Location, game environment, workload, and production

Season	Week	Opponent	Site	Environment	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %	QB rating
2026	1	LV	Away	Indoor	16.7	16.7	220	39	0	1	1	55.6%	66.9
2026	2	SF	Away	Outdoor · 69°	12.5	12.5	197	6	1	0	0	60.9%	103
2026	3	KC	Home	Outdoor · 86°	10	10	210	56	0	0	1	55.6%	61.1
2026	4	MIN	Away	Indoor	2.5	2.5	85	11	0	0	0	52.9%	67
2026	5	CIN	Home	Outdoor	18.9	18.9	137	74	1	1	2	55.6%	51
2026	7	NYJ	Away	Outdoor	26	26	208	37	2	1	0	66.7%	130.7
2026	8	NE	Home	Outdoor	14.6	14.6	211	2	2	0	1	65.6%	92.1
2026	9	DET	Home	Outdoor	3.8	3.8	128	7	0	0	1	52%	50.1

Career totals

Regular-season totals across available career history

Season	Team	Games	PPR	PPR / game	Pass yards	Rush yards	Pass TDs	Rush TDs	INT	Completion %
2022	TEN	8	19.3	2.4	276	123	0	1	3	50.8%
2023	TEN	3	3.1	1	74	21	0	0	0	80%
2024	GB	7	51.8	7.4	550	138	3	1	0	74.1%
2025	GB	4	51.2	12.8	422	123	3	2	0	85.7%
2026	MIA	8	105	13.1	1,396	232	6	3	6	58.2%
Career	All teams	30	230.4	7.7	2,718	637	12	7	9	62.3%

Weekly CFI is a same-position percentile grade using the published weekly play and production fields. CFI uses the same position model as the leaderboard. A dash means the source data or a qualified model is unavailable. Historical production is from nflverse; charted blocking and pressure metrics cover published charting reports only. Missing values are left blank rather than estimated.