A'Shawn Robinson

DL · TB · Active

Age 31College AlabamaDepth RDE #1

Cumulative season CFI61.2#26 of 126 · same-position season grade

Weekly CFI · Week 254.2#48 of 112 · same-position weekly grade

Predictive CFI · vs MIN55Week 3 · experimental projection · low confidence

How this is estimated

Experimental DT projection: qualified current-season grades from the previous four weeks, weighted by snaps and recency and regressed toward 50. Opponent unit pass and run performance adjusts the estimate by at most four points. Limited game history; low confidence.

Next matchup

Current schedule and opponent context

Week 3

Home · 2026-09-27 · 4:05 PMTB vs MINRaymond James Stadium · 86°F · 5 mph wind · Partly Sunny

Matchup rank#12#1 is the easiest opposing offense by EPA/play

CFI history and comparable paths

Qualified weekly form plus the closest same-position index profiles

Same-position context

A'Shawn RobinsonJohn Jenkins · comparableOtito Ogbonnia · comparableLeonard Williams · comparable

John JenkinsBAL · 61.2 CFI Otito OgbonniaDAL · 60.9 CFI Leonard WilliamsSEA · 61.6 CFI

Weekly CFI history

Same-position percentile grade for each qualifying week in 2026. The season CFI above is the cumulative grade.

Week	Weekly CFI	Rank	Qualified players	Volume
1	67.9	#17	94	32
2	54.2	#48	112	31

Advanced Player Research

Production, usage, efficiency, and indexes for 2026

Performance · 2026

Advanced efficiency

defense

Pressure rate: 6.45%
Pass rush win rate: 3.33%
Run stop rate: 16.67%
Sacks / pass rush: 3.23%
Hits / pass rush: 3.23%
Hurries / pass rush: 0%
Missed tackle rate: 10%
Defensive grade: 74.17
Pass rush grade: 54.54
Run defense grade: 75.19
Pressures: 2
Charted sacks: 1
Charted QB hits: 1
QB hurries: 0
Batted passes: 0
Run stops: 5
Charted solo tackles: 7
Charted assists: 2
Missed tackles: 1
Defensive snaps: 63
Pass rush snaps: 31
Run defense snaps: 32

Core indexes · experimental v1.4

CoreFootball Index (CFI) #26 of 12661.2

Same-position rank: #26 of 126. Eligible position cohort: players.

Input	Value	Percentile	Weight

Weekly game log

Week	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
1	3	5	0	1	7.1%	0	0	0	0	0
2	2	5	1	1	5.9%	0	0	0	1	0

Home and away

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
HomeSmall sample	1	2	5	1	1	5.9%	0	0	0	1	0
AwaySmall sample	1	3	5	0	1	7.1%	0	0	0	0	0

Indoor and outdoor

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
OutdoorSmall sample	2	5	10	1	2	6.5%	0	0	0	1	0

Temperature

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
70°F and aboveSmall sample	2	5	10	1	2	6.5%	0	0	0	1	0

Wind

Production by game setting

Split	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
Below 10 mphSmall sample	2	5	10	1	2	6.5%	0	0	0	1	0

Opponent history

Performance against opponents across imported seasons

Opponent	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended	Last meeting
INDSmall sample	2	0	0	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	1	2021-09-19
TENSmall sample	2	5	7	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	1	2021-11-07
GB	9	19	39	0.5	4	—	0	1	0	3	2	2025-11-02
CHI	10	12	17	0	2	—	0	0	0	2	2	2024-10-06
PHI	5	6	15	2.5	3	—	0	0	1	2	1	2024-12-08
LA	4	8	14	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	2	2025-11-30
WAS	4	7	13	1	1	—	0	0	0	1	1	2023-11-19
HOUSmall sample	2	1	7	1	1	—	0	0	0	1	0	2021-10-31
MIN	9	17	25	0	0	—	0	0	1	3	2	2021-12-26
JAX	3	7	13	0	1	—	0	1	0	1	0	2025-09-07
NO	8	24	43	0	1	—	1	0	0	0	3	2025-12-14
NYG	5	6	11	1	1	—	0	1	0	3	1	2024-11-10
DAL	8	15	32	0	1	—	0	0	0	2	2	2025-10-12
ARI	12	22	41	2	6	—	0	1	0	3	1	2025-09-14
ATL	6	5	20	0	1	—	0	0	0	0	1	2025-11-16
CARSmall sample	2	3	6	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	0	2022-10-16
PITSmall sample	1	2	4	0	1	—	0	0	0	0	1	2017-10-29
CLESmall sample	2	4	9	1	2	5.9%	0	0	0	1	0	2026-09-20
BALSmall sample	2	7	9	1	1	—	0	0	0	2	0	2022-01-02
TB	8	10	29	0	2	—	0	0	0	1	0	2026-01-03
CIN	3	4	13	0	1	7.1%	0	0	0	0	1	2026-09-13
SF	8	14	36	1	2	—	0	1	0	0	0	2025-11-24
NE	4	6	15	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	0	2025-09-28
MIA	3	5	7	1	1	—	0	0	0	3	0	2025-10-05
SEA	7	5	25	0	2	—	0	0	1	0	0	2025-12-28
BUF	4	5	13	0.5	1	—	0	1	0	0	0	2025-10-26
LACSmall sample	2	8	10	0.5	1	—	0	0	0	0	0	2024-09-15
KCSmall sample	2	7	10	0	0	—	0	0	1	1	1	2024-11-24
LV	3	1	10	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	0	2024-09-22
NYJ	3	5	9	1	1	—	0	0	0	1	0	2025-10-19
DETSmall sample	1	1	3	0	0	—	0	0	0	0	0	2021-10-24
DENSmall sample	1	3	5	2	2	—	0	0	0	2	0	2024-10-27

Game log

Location, game environment, workload, and production

Season	Week	Opponent	Site	Environment	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
2026	1	CIN	Away	Outdoor · 85°	3	5	0	1	7.1%	0	0	0	0	0
2026	2	CLE	Home	Outdoor · 86°	2	5	1	1	5.9%	0	0	0	1	0

Career totals

Regular-season totals across available career history

Season	Team	Games	Solo tackles	Combined tackles	Sacks	QB hits	Pressure rate	INT	Forced fumbles	Fumble recoveries	Tackles for loss	Passes defended
2016	DET	16	22	30	2	2	—	0	0	0	6	7
2017	DET	16	31	53	0.5	6	—	1	1	0	4	6
2018	DET	13	30	49	1	4	—	0	1	1	3	0
2019	DET	13	28	40	1.5	2	—	0	1	2	2	3
2020	LA	8	4	12	0	1	—	0	0	0	0	1
2021	LA	17	24	67	2	2	—	0	2	0	2	0
2022	LA	10	18	42	0	3	—	0	0	0	0	0
2023	NYG	17	25	62	0	1	—	0	0	0	3	2
2024	CAR	16	36	80	5.5	8	—	0	1	0	8	1
2025	CAR	17	21	65	2.5	8	—	0	0	1	3	3
2026	TB	2	5	10	1	2	6.5%	0	0	0	1	0
Career	All teams	145	244	510	16	39	6.5%	1	6	4	32	23

Weekly CFI is a same-position percentile grade using the published weekly play and production fields. CFI uses the same position model as the leaderboard. A dash means the source data or a qualified model is unavailable. Historical production is from nflverse; charted blocking and pressure metrics cover published charting reports only. Missing values are left blank rather than estimated.