2026 SEASON · WEEK 3
← Active players
Solo tackles11 Combined tackles16 Sacks1.5 QB hits2 Pressure rate40% INT0 Forced fumbles0 Fumble recoveries0 Tackles for loss1 Passes defended1 Same-position context
ACTIVE PLAYER PROFILE
Budda Baker
S · 
ARI · Active
Age 30College WashingtonDepth SS #1
Defensive coverage context
Hybrid safety
Deep 34%Box 45%Slot 18%
Week 2 Pass Coverage
70 defensive snaps · 27 coverage snaps
Targets7
Receptions allowed6
Completion rate allowed85.7%
Yards allowed117
Pass breakups1
Passer rating allowed158.3
Interceptions0
Forced incompletions1
Man coverage3 snaps · 1 targetCoverage grade 48.5
Zone coverage13 snaps · 4 targetsCoverage grade 62
Credited tackle stops 4 · Third/fourth-down stops 0 · Red-zone stops 1.5
Week 1 Pass Coverage
55 defensive snaps · 36 coverage snaps
Targets2
Receptions allowed2
Completion rate allowed100%
Yards allowed29
Pass breakups0
Passer rating allowed118.8
Interceptions0
Forced incompletions0
Man coverage2 snaps · 0 targetsCoverage grade 61.4
Zone coverage24 snaps · 1 targetCoverage grade 66.6
Credited tackle stops 1 · Third/fourth-down stops 1 · Red-zone stops 0
CFI history and comparable paths
Qualified weekly form plus the closest same-position index profiles
Budda BakerNick Cross · comparableDerwin James Jr. · comparableIsaiah Pola-Mao · comparable
Weekly CFI history
Same-position percentile grade for each qualifying week in 2026. The season CFI above is the cumulative grade.
| Week | Weekly CFI | Rank | Qualified players | Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.3 | #49 | 71 | 55 |
| 2 | 39.5 | #51 | 71 | 70 |
Advanced Player Research
Production, usage, efficiency, and indexes for 2026
Performance · 2026
Advanced efficiency
defense
- Pressure rate
- 40%
- Pass rush win rate
- 0%
- Run stop rate
- 8.93%
- Sacks / pass rush
- 40%
- Hits / pass rush
- 0%
- Hurries / pass rush
- 0%
- Missed tackle rate
- 6.25%
- Defensive grade
- 55.53
- Pass rush grade
- 71.3
- Run defense grade
- 68.89
- Coverage grade
- 46.65
- Pressures
- 2
- Charted sacks
- 2
- Charted QB hits
- 0
- QB hurries
- 0
- Batted passes
- 0
- Run stops
- 5
- Charted solo tackles
- 15
- Charted assists
- 0
- Missed tackles
- 1
- Defensive snaps
- 125
- Pass rush snaps
- 5
- Run defense snaps
- 57
Core indexes · experimental v1.4
Weekly game log
| Week | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.5 | 1 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Home and away
Production by game setting
| Split | Games | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HomeSmall sample | 1 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| AwaySmall sample | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.5 | 1 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Indoor and outdoor
Production by game setting
| Split | Games | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IndoorSmall sample | 2 | 11 | 16 | 1.5 | 2 | 40% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Temperature
Production by game setting
| Split | Games | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|
Game setting data is unavailable for this selection.
Wind
Production by game setting
| Split | Games | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|
Game setting data is unavailable for this selection.
Opponent history
Performance against opponents across imported seasons
| Opponent | Games | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended | Last meeting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DET | 6 | 25 | 33 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2024-09-22 |
| IND | 3 | 14 | 24 | 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2025-10-12 |
| DAL | 4 | 14 | 18 | 2 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2025-11-03 |
| SF | 16 | 83 | 139 | 1.5 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 2025-11-16 |
| PHI | 4 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2023-12-31 |
| TB | 4 | 12 | 28 | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2025-11-30 |
| LA | 17 | 77 | 125 | 0.5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 2026-01-04 |
| SEA | 19 | 89 | 148 | 2 | 3 | 50% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 2026-09-20 |
| HOU | 4 | 18 | 27 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2025-12-14 |
| JAX | 3 | 11 | 19 | 0.5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2025-11-23 |
| TEN | 3 | 14 | 21 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2025-10-05 |
| WAS | 5 | 25 | 36 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2024-09-29 |
| NYG | 3 | 14 | 27 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2020-12-13 |
| CHI | 4 | 28 | 38 | 0.5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2024-11-03 |
| MIN | 4 | 23 | 36 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2024-12-01 |
| DENSmall sample | 2 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2022-12-18 |
| KCSmall sample | 2 | 9 | 16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-11 |
| GB | 4 | 16 | 27 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2025-10-19 |
| ATL | 4 | 16 | 31 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2025-12-21 |
| BALSmall sample | 2 | 11 | 17 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2023-10-29 |
| CAR | 5 | 12 | 29 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2025-09-14 |
| CINSmall sample | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2019-10-06 |
| NO | 3 | 16 | 29 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2025-09-07 |
| PITSmall sample | 2 | 11 | 16 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2023-12-03 |
| CLE | 3 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2023-11-05 |
| NYJSmall sample | 2 | 12 | 19 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2024-11-10 |
| MIASmall sample | 2 | 8 | 17 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2024-10-27 |
| BUFSmall sample | 2 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2024-09-08 |
| NE | 3 | 9 | 19 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2024-12-15 |
| LVSmall sample | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2022-09-18 |
| LAC | 3 | 10 | 18 | 0.5 | 1 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2026-09-13 |
Game log
Location, game environment, workload, and production
| Season | Week | Opponent | Site | Environment | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1 | LAC | Away | Indoor | 4 | 5 | 0.5 | 1 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 2 | SEA | Home | Indoor | 7 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 50% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career totals
Regular-season totals across available career history
| Season | Team | Games | Solo tackles | Combined tackles | Sacks | QB hits | Pressure rate | INT | Forced fumbles | Fumble recoveries | Tackles for loss | Passes defended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | ARI | 16 | 56 | 74 | 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2018 | ARI | 14 | 71 | 102 | 2 | 3 | — | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
| 2019 | ARI | 16 | 91 | 147 | 0.5 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 2020 | ARI | 15 | 84 | 118 | 2 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
| 2021 | ARI | 17 | 60 | 98 | 2 | 3 | — | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 2022 | ARI | 15 | 60 | 111 | 0 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| 2023 | ARI | 12 | 47 | 87 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 2024 | ARI | 17 | 85 | 163 | 2 | 3 | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
| 2025 | ARI | 16 | 54 | 120 | 0.5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 2026 | ARI | 2 | 11 | 16 | 1.5 | 2 | 40% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Career | All teams | 140 | 619 | 1,036 | 11.5 | 21 | 40% | 8 | 7 | 6 | 48 | 45 |
Weekly CFI is a same-position percentile grade using the published weekly play and production fields. CFI uses the same position model as the leaderboard. A dash means the source data or a qualified model is unavailable. Historical production is from nflverse; charted blocking and pressure metrics cover published charting reports only. Missing values are left blank rather than estimated.